This blog is dedicated to the topics of Course materials, Innovation, and Technology in Education. it is intended as an information source for the college store industry, or anyone interested in how course materials are changing. Suggestions for discussion topics or news stories are welcome.

The site uses Google's cookies to provide services and analyze traffic. Your IP address and user agent are shared with Google, along with performance and security statistics to ensure service quality, generate usage statistics, detect abuse and take action.

Monday, October 21, 2013

Report Takes Aim at Online Ed Profits

The Campaign for the Future of Higher Education, a coalition of faculty groups, has released a report that claims the rhetoric behind online learning is more about making money than academic results.

“Promise” of Online Higher Education: Profits states that the expansion of online education in general and massive open online courses (MOOCs) in particular, is being driven by corporations at the expense of students or public interest. It also recommends that terms used to describe online formats should be re-examined to better help students and institutions make informed decisions on their usefulness, according to a report in Campus Technology.

“Increasingly, online higher education is big business with huge profits being made by many private companies,” the authors of the paper wrote. “We are told repeatedly that students will benefit from the rush toward online learning, but we must ask who’s benefiting more: Students? Or investors and companies?”

To illustrate, the report points to companies such as Coursera, which recently announced it had made $1 million in profits from its massive open online courses. There are a number of other firms generating “robust” profits from converting traditional degree programs into online versions.

The report “shines a light on how leaders in government and in our colleges and universities are being enticed by snappy slogans and slick sales pitches into making decisions that benefit investors and corporations instead of the students we’re supposed to serve,” said UCLA history Lillian Taiz. 

No comments: